guglfood.blogg.se -

Does fastrawviewer have a focus point option

#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION FULL#
#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION SOFTWARE#
#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION OFFLINE#
#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION SERIES#
#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION FREE#

DAM not as strong as Digikam, but built-in editing is better.

#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION FULL#

DarkTable - FOSS more of a full LR replacement.

– An external editor can be used, but I have read that integration on macOS is not as strong. This means the program doens’t have to reapply edits each time, but with JPGs, this can result in repetitive loss during compression. Instead a new version of the photo is saved for each edit. – as I understand it, non-destructive editing is not implemented the way many apps (Photos, LR) do with sidecar files, ie the actual edits saved as steps that can be reapplied.

Seems to be one of the closest to LR’s DAM functionality, and is probably the one I’m currently most likely to try. They had improved DAM features on their roadmap, but every new release has been focused on editing features. For example, I have been watching Skylum Luminar since it was first released. This is the biggest mismatch from my needs vs what I see in discussed. Most of the LR alternatives that are mentioned are more focused on editing that DAM, and new releases often tout the improvements to correcting, retouching, filters, etc. I have considered purchasing LR Classic (desktop version) and renewing on the months I need it, and that is still an option.

#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION SOFTWARE#

Most months the software would go unused. Given my infrequent use, Adobe’s subscription model makes very little sense for me. TL DR summary: flexible, full-featured storage, organization, and searching, with simple, common editing features

Sharing/Export options - most commonly used is creating web albums, and ability to control styling/layout/theme is preferred.

Probably came from history with IPhoto/Photos randomly named folders inside the Library.

flexible storage structure - I want to be able to store images as I want, allowing migration, easy backup, etc.

Cloud sync/backup option is also a bonus, but not required.

#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION OFFLINE#

local storage - Option for primary local offline storage, ideally with support for sometimes attached removable drives (but that’s not required).

strong search/filtering capabilities - keywords, dates, location.

Both modifying and removing depending on actions

metadata support - GPS, keywords, etc.

Especially with capturing in JPG, and don’t want repetitive losses with each save

non-destructive editing - I’m not a big editor as noted, so I like to be able to get back to the original, since I often don’t know what will look better.

Make more use of DAM features (batch import, organizing, tagging, rating, searching).

I edit very few photos overall, and then often cropping or other minor common edits (redeye, brightness/contrast) for a specific purpose.

I use LR infrequently, probably only 6-8 times a year overall, when adding new photos.

#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION SERIES#

Capture in JPG/HEIF mostly using iPhone, GoPro, or compact camera like Canon Powershot series.

Amateur, capturing photos of personal travel and events.I’ve been keeping my eye on options for the past several years, and my needs don’t seem to exactly match the focus of many products these days, so I thought this community might have some valuable input or interest. 🙁 I’ll be testing it out though, and see if it’s worth the $15 to have something that really shows what I need to see, and at a speed that is acceptable.I’m still using Lightroom 6.14 (LR) on a MBP with a Mojave partition, and while I wasn’t smart enough to use the last year of isolation to migrate, new photos piling up from summertime activities this year is resurfacing the issue for me.

#DOES FASTRAWVIEWER HAVE A FOCUS POINT OPTION FREE#

So now I’m back to looking at FastRawViewer again! The free Beta testing period is over, so I’ll have to pay $14.99 to use for longer than 30 days. Now, I can set it to preview the actual RAW data, but that slows it down so much (3-8 seconds between photos) that it’s actually faster to use Lightroom! But, unfortunately, it views the jpeg preview, which is so highly compressed that it is almost worthless for judging critical sharpness at 100% zoom. Now this would not be a problem if FastStone read the data from the RAW file. DNG files are already so large, (20-30 MB each) that they implement some extremely high jpeg compression for the built in previews. Lightroom seems to have a bit of an issue with Pentax’s. However, I have a problem with it now… I upgraded from my Canon Rebel T3, to a Pentax K-5 DSLR, which shoots RAW files in either. I guess it’s been about exactly a year since the last post on this thread! I’ve used Fast Stone Image Viewer for probably 95% of all my photo viewing, and I’m still happy with it!